A térbeli (im)mobilitás társadalomtudományos perspektívái – Szerkesztői előszó

Szerzők

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51624/SzocSzemle.24175

Hivatkozások

Bærenholdt, J. O. (2013). Governmobility: The powers of mobility. Mobilities, 8(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.747754

Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. Verso.

Bourdieu, P. (1987). What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32.

Crary, J. (1999). A megfigyelő módszerei: Látás és modernitás a 19. században. Osiris.

Farrugia, D. (2016). The mobility imperative for rural youth: The structural, symbolic and nonrepresentational dimensions of rural youth mobilities. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(6), 836–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2015.1112886

Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France. Palgrave Macmillan.

Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997). The field as site, method, and location in anthropology. In A. Gupta & J. Ferguson (Eds.), Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science (pp. 1–46). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520342392-002

Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100500489189

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001

Kesselring, S. (2015). Corporate mobilities regimes: Mobility, power and the socio-geographical structurations of mobile work. Mobilities, 10(4), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.887249

Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523

Mata-Codesal, D. (2015). Ways of staying put in Ecuador: Social and embodied experiences of mobility-immobility interactions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(14), 2274–2290. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1053850

Mata-Codesal, D. (2018). Is it simpler to leave or to stay put? Desired immobility in a Mexican village. Population, Space and Place, 24(4), Article e2127. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2127

Niedermüller, P. (2006). A lokalitás metamorfózisai. Replika, (56–57), 33–44.

Østergaard, J., Pless, M., Blackman, S., & MacDonald, R. (2024). “Nothing happens here, but that’s ok”: Reflexivity, immobility and staying among young people in marginalised rural locations. Journal of Youth Studies, 27(9), 1256–1273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2024.2352716

Preece, J. (2018). Immobility and insecure labour markets: An active response to precarious employment. Urban Studies, 55(8), 1783–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017736258

Schewel, K. (2020). Understanding immobility: Moving beyond the mobility bias in migration studies. International Migration Review, 54(2), 328–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319831952

Schivelbusch, W. (2008). A vasúti utazás története: A tér és az idő iparosodása a 19. században. Napvilág.

Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268

Silva, A. V. da. (2025). Beyond the American dream: Unveiling the complexity of young people’s (im)mobility in Governador Valadares, Brazil. Mobilities, 20(1), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2024.2393333

Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. Routledge.

Letöltések

Megjelent

2026-11-12

Hogyan kell idézni

A térbeli (im)mobilitás társadalomtudományos perspektívái – Szerkesztői előszó. (2026). Szociológiai Szemle, 36(3), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.51624/SzocSzemle.24175